

- Getuigenis van groot persoonlijk wonder
- Bidden achterhaald
- In iedere man woont een gevaarlijke strijder
- Familieweek in Adelboden
- 3-9-2010
- 22-8-2010
- 19-8-2010
- 17-8-2010
- 4-8-2010
- 4-8-2010
I was pleasantly surprised with your email of this morning on Jesus vs. capitalism. Please allow me to help you gain an even greater insight by sharing some exegesis by Pinchas Lapide(*) with you. In your email I missed the part about where Jesus is asked whether we should pay taxes. You can find it in Luke 20:21-26 / Mark 12:13-17 / Matthew 22:15-22. We can learn so much from this passage about capitalism:
- Jesus asks for a denarius (penny), from which we can deduce that He himself did NOT possess Roman money (He possibly did carry around Jewish money). This is an important detail, because in the same passage we also read that Caesar Nero was depicted on them, who glorified himself as a god - it even said so on the coin! Thereby, this depiction was in direct breach with the second commandment (Exodus 20:4), thus it is understandable that Jesus didn't have carry these coins around.
- “Give the Emperor what belongs to him and give God what belongs to God.” - Looking closely at the source text, it's not about "giving" to the Caesar, but "returning" (giving back). Give him back what? Why, his cursed silver of course! (Cursed? Yes, see Exodus 20:4-5). Lapide also points to 1 Chronicles 29:14 and the associated explanation in the Talmud book Abot 111,8.
- In Jewish tradition, the order in which something is said is very relevant. Usually, God is named first, and others (i.e., Caesar) second. But here (see point 2), Jesus mentions Caesar first. This should indicate that it is not about giving in a human sense (e.g., pay taxes), but it is a condition that you either serve God, or Mammon. You can't serve both (which is what Jesus literally said in Matthew 6:24).
- But did Jesus mean that we should pay taxes? Lapide asserts: NO. For one, Jesus did not own any cursed Roman money. Second, by "giving" He meant "let the guy choke on it". Third and most importantly, in Luke 23:2, Jesus is accused of the following: “We caught this man trying to get our people to riot and to stop paying taxes to the Emperor. He also claims that he is the Messiah, our king.” Case in point.
God bless you.
Sunday, October 4th, 2009
Friends,
I'd like to have a word with those of you who call yourselves Christians (Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, Bill Maherists, etc. can read along, too, as much of what I have to say, I'm sure, can be applied to your own spiritual/ethical values).
In my new film I speak for the first time in one of my movies about my own spiritual beliefs. I have always believed that one's religious leanings are deeply personal and should be kept private. After all, we've heard enough yammerin' in the past three decades about how one should "behave," and I have to say I'm pretty burned out on pieties and platitudes considering we are a violent nation who invades other countries and punishes our own for having the audacity to fall on hard times.
I'm also against any proselytizing; I certainly don't want you to join anything I belong to. Also, as a Catholic, I have much to say about the Church as an institution, but I'll leave that for another day (or movie).
Amidst all the Wall Street bad guys and corrupt members of Congress exposed in "Capitalism: A Love Story," I pose a simple question in the movie: "Is capitalism a sin?" I go on to ask, "Would Jesus be a capitalist?" Would he belong to a hedge fund? Would he sell short? Would he approve of a system that has allowed the richest 1% to have more financial wealth than the 95% under them combined?
I have come to believe that there is no getting around the fact that capitalism is opposite everything that Jesus (and Moses and Mohammed and Buddha) taught. All the great religions are clear about one thing: It is evil to take the majority of the pie and leave what's left for everyone to fight over. Jesus said that the rich man would have a very hard time getting into heaven. He told us that we had to be our brother's and sister's keepers and that the riches that did exist were to be divided fairly. He said that if you failed to house the homeless and feed the hungry, you'd have a hard time finding the pin code to the pearly gates.
I guess that's bad news for us Americans. Here's how we define "Blessed Are the Poor": We now have the highest unemployment rate since 1983. There's a foreclosure filing once every 7.5 seconds. 14,000 people every day lose their health insurance.
At the same time, Wall Street bankers ("Blessed Are the Wealthy"?) are amassing more and more loot -- and they do their best to pay little or no income tax (last year Goldman Sachs' tax rate was a mere 1%!). Would Jesus approve of this? If not, why do we let such an evil system continue? It doesn't seem you can call yourself a Capitalist AND a Christian -- because you cannot love your money AND love your neighbor when you are denying your neighbor the ability to see a doctor just so you can have a better bottom line. That's called "immoral" -- and you are committing a sin when you benefit at the expense of others.
When you are in church this morning, please think about this. I am asking you to allow your "better angels" to come forward. And if you are among the millions of Americans who are struggling to make it from week to week, please know that I promise to do what I can to stop this evil -- and I hope you'll join me in not giving up until everyone has a seat at the table.
Thanks for listening. I'm off to Mass in a few hours. I'll be sure to ask the priest if he thinks J.C. deals in derivatives or credit default swaps. I mean, after all, he must've been good at math. How else did he divide up two loaves of bread and five pieces of fish equally amongst 5,000 people? Either he was the first socialist or his disciples were really bad at packing lunch. Or both.
Yours,Michael Moore
MichaelMoore.com